🔗 Share this article

When the Russian President visited the South Asian nation in the previous decade, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, limited by the global health crisis, focused on discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era preceded a significant shift in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious statements and the introduction of heavy trade tariffs.

"In this context, the importance of this diplomatic mission to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a rejection of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Critical Juncture for Both Nations

The summit occurs at a crucial time. President Putin arrives following rejecting latest peace proposals for Ukraine, bolstered by claimed gains by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the primary importance of this engagement is its very occurrence," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a movement toward something resembling routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the risks are particularly elevated. The country faces a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a public commentary criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a firm response from Indian officials, who called it an unacceptable interference.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and is firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's top arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West until a change in approach.

Over time, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. However, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, accusations mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"In response, India has reverted to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," noted a strategic analyst. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Apart from global diplomacy, India's fundamental concern with Russia is geography. "Beijing continues to be the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst added.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, leading to efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, decreasing its reliance on Russian equipment from a dominant share to a reduced portion in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but not become so dependent that a sudden cutoff would cripple its defenses," the analyst concluded.

The Oil Question

Increased trade relations is expected to be a major topic. President Putin has recently emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", defying Western sanctions.

The matter of energy purchases is pivotal. Although the Indian government has stated to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to increase imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "hurdles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue without major disruption. The official minimized the effect of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "minor" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be addressed primarily through India's consistent appeal for dialogue and peace.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi has access to both sides, the nation does not possess the diplomatic clout to significantly influence the conflict," the analyst noted. "Beyond urging negotiations, its ability to make a difference is limited."

Ultimately, despite the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," driven by national interest in a volatile world.